Co-Existing with AI.

Whether you are a student, an entrepreneur, or the leader of a business or a nation, you will need new strategies to become, and remain, successful.

A head in silhouette opening onto a green field, with a bird on the steps and clouds passing through

Artificial intelligence is not arriving as a product decision.

It is arriving as a change to what work is, who does it, and what a person is for inside an organization. The Center studies the human side of it. What actually happens to people when the work is done alongside a machine. What a leader is supposed to do about it on Monday.

A model brain on a yellow grid, marked by a cursor and a red dot

The Co-Existence Record

Follow the questions back to the conversation.

The Co-Existence Record is the public, interactive part of Co-Existing with AI. It turns ideas from The Ayush Prakash Podcast into questions, evidence, and perspectives that people can explore at their own pace, then trace back to the original source.

Explore the Record

AI is new. The question is not.

Coexistence is not acceptance.

Living alongside a technology means asking it to show its work before granting it trust. Every institution is held to that standard. Artificial intelligence has mostly been exempted from it. The Center holds itself to the same test.

The question is older than the technology.

The Center has worked on this since 2010. Through robotics. Through the last automation cycle. Now through this one. The through line is not the tool. It is what happens to the people standing next to it.

Written for the person who has to act.

Not for the reader who wants to be persuaded. Every session, assessment and paper ends in something a specific person can do. In an organization that already exists. With the constraints it already has.

How the program works

01

Convene

Researchers, policy staff and operators in one room, on one question. Not separate rooms describing it to each other.

02

Publish

Assessments that let someone outside an institution measure it against a standard it did not set. Then the step-by-step material for whoever has to act on the result.

03

Advise

Private briefings and workshops for leadership teams, delivered by the Center's own principals. No client, sponsor or employer determines what the program publishes.

CIF Before the Senate

The colonnade of a parliamentary building

Senate of Canada · 2 February 2017

Foresight meets reality.

A comparison of CIF’s 2017 Senate testimony with the evidence available in 2026: what has developed, what is partly supported and what remains unresolved.

Read the 2017–2026 comparison

Bring the program into your organization.

Delivered by the people who did the research, shaped around what your organization is working through.

A briefing

Ninety minutes with a leadership team. The argument, the evidence behind it, and what it means for one specific operation rather than for the economy.

A working session

A full day, built around the decisions actually in front of the team. They leave with their own answer written down, not the Center's.

A standing arrangement

The Center works alongside a team across a quarter or a year, because the question keeps moving and a single session freezes it.

A hosted convening

The organization hosts a public session and shapes the agenda alongside the Center rather than joining a finished one.

Host, partner, or bring the program in.

Start a conversation